Prophecy

With the disillusionment in some circles regarding the prophetic day-year metric, it is time to reconsider the biblical data and turn away from the uninformed gossip that has fueled the uncertainties. This paper assumes an intimate connection between the eighth and ninth chapters of Daniel, and rather than dwelling on the specifics of Daniel 8:14, examines the impact of Daniel 9:24–27 in the NT corpus. If it can be demonstrated that Daniel 9 legitimately employs the year-day principle, then that provides solid evidence for the traditional chronology of the vision of Daniel 8. Not only is the vision of Daniel 9 key to the understanding of the mission of Messiah, but it also outlines a series of specific markers that include the appearance, mission, and death of Messiah. The writers of the New Testament recognized some of these chronological pointers as evidenced by a string of (20+) references, throughout the NT, that speak of “the fullness of time.” The obvious question is, “What time?” This paper demonstrates that the time they spoke of was Daniel’s prophecy found in Daniel 9.

Dispensationalism is one of the most influential theological systems in this presentation of Christian eschatology. It is a movement of eschatological interpretation of biblical prophecy distinguished by its belief that a literal hermeneutic mandates a consistent distinction between Israel and the church. Its understanding of the signs of the second coming of Jesus Christ and of the fulfillment of these signs not only presents unique features of its understanding of the Bible prophecy but also expresses its particular characteristics. In order to have a sound biblical understanding of the signs of Jesus’ Christ’s second coming, the understanding of dispensationalism should be critically evaluated. This presentation will analyze dispensationalists’ understanding of the signs of the second coming of Jesus Christ and their fulfillments. Based on that analysis, it will provide a critical evaluation of their understanding on the subject.

This presentation accepts and assumes the solid work done by other Seventh-day Adventist scholars in establishing the date of 457 BC as the starting date for the 2,300-day prophecy of Daniel 8:14, and AD 1844 as the ending date of the prophecy. Building on these biblically based conclusions, this study explores fresh evidence from Scripture, chronology, and Karaite history in order to determine if there can be more precision with regard to the starting and ending dates of the 2,300 day-year prophecy. It concludes that the time period of the prophecy certainly begins in the autumn (not spring) of 457 BC—probably on the Day of Atonement, October 30—and ends on the Day of Atonement in AD 1844, which, according to the biblical reckoning, almost certainly fell on October 22 that year, not September 23.

The purpose of this presentation is to analyze eschatological events mentioned by the gift of prophecy manifested in Ellen G. White: the United States and its identification as the second beast of Revelation 13, the union of all the churches, the Sabbath as the sign of God as opposed to the mark of the beast, and how these events have been confirmed throughout history to this day

This study uses the biblical-historicist method of interpreting the prophecy of Daniel 11. The interpretation of this chapter follows a Christocentric, cross-centered interpretation where the first part (11:1-29) focuses on the great controversy before the cross, dealing with the literal history of kingdoms in geographic areas. The second part (11:30-45) focuses on the great controversy during the Christian era after the cross between spiritual Israel and apostate Christianity where kingdoms and places take on spiritual and global meanings. When interpreting texts in the context of the time of the end, these are not explained with its focus on literal Israel with its Middle Eastern background, but in the light of spiritual Israel with its spiritual and universal perspectives.

This presentation deals with the battle of Armageddon in connection with the fall of Babylon according to Revelation 16:12–16. It deals with the meaning of Armageddon from the presupposition that John alludes to the Old Testament in building his idea of the final battle. The point in discussion is whether Armageddon will start after or before the sixth plague and when preparations for it will take place. This presentation proposes that the passage may be a parenthetic vision that deals with events that happen before the plagues, as John makes between the sixth and seventh elements in the seals and trumpets’ visions. This interlude would be a pattern in these sets of visions.

Understanding and interpreting the last three chapters of the book of Daniel have always been a challenge to scholars and readers of the Bible. The central prophetic content of Daniel 11:2b–12:3 that refers to the mysterious kings of the north and the south has been particularly obscure. Though this section has been either studied superficially or totally ignored in Adventist literature, during the last twenty years there has been a change toward this prophecy. This presentation also evaluates new approaches to Daniel 11 facing Adventism. This study recognizes the basic importance of grammatical and syntactical work in the exegetical enterprise. Furthermore, it demonstrates that structural analysis provides better comprehension of the passage and the flow of thoughts contained in it. It also deals with the parallelism of the Danielic prophecies and hints the chapter itself provides for its interpretation. These guidelines offer a structure for understanding Daniel 10–12.

This presentation examines the theological, methodological, and historical process that characterizes the development of the futuristic system of prophetic interpretation, especially the books of Daniel and Revelation, until its establishment as the Dispensationalism. Here it is shown that the adoption of the hermeneutics methodology known as futurism, based on a literal interpretation of Scripture and the concept of a double fulfillment, has gained ground among Protestant movements to almost eliminate the system of the prophetic interpretation of the Reformation. In this way, the acceptance of the futuristic methodological approach inexorably has led to transform the eschatological interpretation in both Protestantism and Adventism.

The millennium issue is one of the most controversial in Christian eschatology. This presentation compares two approaches toward the millennium: the Orthodox and the Adventist. The understanding of the Orthodox position on this crucial eschatological problem is very important for the Seventh-day Adventist Church in countries that traditionally were under the strong influence and dominion of the Orthodox Church. Analysis and evaluation of two positions, and finding common ground and distinctions, will facilitate a constructive dialogue between Orthodox and Adventist believers.

The most notorious number in the Bible is the enigmatic number of the Sea Beast, 666 (Rev 13:18). After discussing the visual representation of this number in the earliest Greek manuscripts in light of recent numerical and papyrological research, I will explore the meaning of the verb ψηφίζω in 13:18 and other biblical and extra-biblical texts. I conclude that 666 is not a number to be understood as a series of three sixes, that the interpretation of the cryptogram must be understood from the standpoint of psephical calculations of the numerical equivalents the letters of ancient alphabets, and that the symbolic meaning of the number, or of its factor of six, is not primary to the text.