Eschatological Significance Of The Name ‘The Alpha And The Omega’

Richard Sabuin

Identity of the Alpha and the Omega

The title “The Alpha and the Omega,” occurs uniquely in the book of Revelation (1:8; 21:6; 22:13). Its identity should not be debated of whether it refers either to God or to Jesus. The literary contexts suggest that in 1:8 and 21:6 the title refers to God,1 and in 22:13 it refers to Jesus Christ.2 It may be understood that this title refers both to God and to Christ, because the book of Revelation itself is introduced by John as “The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him” (Rev 1:1).3 The fact that in 22:13 Jesus calls himself with the titles of God, namely, “the Alpha and the Omega” (1:8) and “the Beginning and the End” (21:6), indicates that Jesus deserves and has the authority and sovereignty that belong to God.4 With this, the titles attributed to God are now attributed to Jesus Christ.5 This attribution of God’s title to Christ in 22:13 highlights the deity of Christ,6 and, at the same time, emphasizes the dominant role of Jesus Christ in Revelation. This study, therefore, assumes that the titles of God presented in 1:8 and 21:6 are also the titles of Jesus.

Since the identity of the Alpha and the Omega is no longer a question, this study focuses on the application of the title in the reading of Revelation. What does the title indicate or imply as far as the reading of Revelation in concerned? After reviewing scholars’ opinions about the application of the title to Revelation, this study explores the significance of a title or a name used in a passage to the understanding of the passage. Next, this study gives possible application of the title the Alpha and the Omega to the reading of Revelation.

Title/Name and Literary Context of a Passage

Suggesting that the Alpha and the Omega must have connection with the reading of Revelation requires justification. After the introduction of the Alpha and the Omega in Rev 1:8, John describes in vv. 12 – 16 the one who speaks to him. In vv. 17 – 18, the one whom John describes now introduces Himself to John. He is Jesus Christ.7 Of these twelve descriptions of Jesus Christ,8 most of them are repeated in the messages to the seven churches (Chaps 2 and 3), particularly in the messages to the first five churches,9 because they are related to the message for these churches.10 Descriptions of Jesus in the messages to the Philadelphia and Laodicea are not taken from Rev 1:13-18, but from other places.11 These titles are also related to the messages for these two churches.12 It seems that titles or descriptions of Jesus or God in the Revelation are related with the contexts of the passages where these descriptions appear.

How about the self-introduction of Jesus using egō eimi or egō, “I am,” in Revelation? Not only in Revelation, this kind of first-person-introduction of Jesus appears many times in the Gospels,13 mostly in the Gospel of John.14 Take for example “I am the bread of life” (John 6:35; cf. vv. 41, 48, 51). This self-introduction comes in the context of Jesus feeding the five thousand with five loaves and two fishes (6:1-16). After the miraculous feeding, Jesus crossed the Sea of Galilee heading for Capernaum (vv. 16-20). To those who followed Him crossing the sea, He said, “Truly, truly, I say to you, you seek Me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate of the loaves, and were filled” (v. 26). From that point of statement Jesus develops His teaching and introduces Himself as “the bread of life.” In this case, Jesus uses self-introduction egō eimi according to the context of the passage.

Another example is the description “I am the way” (14:6). In vv. 4 and 5 the word hodos, “way” appears 2 times in the conversation of Thomas and Jesus, in which Jesus says that the disciples know the way where He goes, and then Thomas asks Jesus to show the way to where Jesus will go. This conversation is triggered by repeated statement of Jesus or explanation about Him in relation to His departure indicated by the verb hypagō, “I go, go away, depart,” in the Upper Room context.15 This verb occurs six times before 14:6 (13:3; 13:33; 13:36 [2x]; 14:4; 14:5) and four times after it (14:28; 16:5 [2x]; 16:10; 16:17. This indicates that the title “I am the way” is introduced by Jesus to satisfy the curiosity of the disciples to know where He goes. Thus, the self-introduction of Jesus provides a hint to understand the passage.16 “It unveiled for man something otherwise unknown and inaccessible.”17

Next to the most significant occurrence of “I am” saying of Jesus in John is its occurrence in Revelation—seven times (1:8; 1:17; 2:23; 21:6; 22:13; 22:16 [2x]).18 These seven “I am” introductions present ten titles/descriptions of Jesus: 1) the Alpha and the Omega; 2) who is, who was, and who is to come; 3) the Almighty; 4) the First and the Last; 5) the Living; 6) He who searches the minds and hearts; 7) the Beginning and the End; 8) Jesus; 9) the Root and the Offspring of David; and 10) the bright morning star.19 Of these ten descriptions, the Alpha and the Omega occurs three times (1:8; 21:6; 22:13); who is, who was, and who is to come three times (1:4; 1:8; 4:8);20 the First and the Last three times (1:17; 2:8; 22:13); the Beginning and the End two times (21:6; 22:13); the Almighty seven times (1:8; 4:8; 11:17; 15:3; 16:7; 19:6; 21:22). All others appear only once.21 As the egō eimi introductions of Jesus is related to a passage where they occur in John, it is also the case with their occurrences in the book of Revelation.

The title the Alpha and the Omega always comes with at least one of the three titles that are used more than once in Revelation: Who Is and Who Was and Who Is to Come (1:8); the Beginning and the End (21:6); and the First and the Last (22:13). In 22:13 it comes with the last two. This indicates that these three titles should be considered in an attempt of interpreting the meaning of the Alpha and the Omega in Revelation. The fact that the Alpha and the Omega occurs only at the beginning and at the end of the book seems to signify that this title is not to be considered in its immediate contexts alone, but throughout the whole literary context of the book, from the prologue up to the epilogue. And the other three titles above must contribute to the understanding of the significance of the Alpha and the Omega.

I limit my discussion only to the three titles of Jesus, namely, the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, and the Beginning and the End, for two reasons: 1) these three titles are presented together 22:13 as the titles of Jesus;22 2) they are parallel in the sense of containing a set of opposite words.23 I will begin with “the First and the Last.”

The First and the Last (ho prōtos kai ho eschatos)

This title of Jesus is first introduced in Rev 1:17, “And when I saw Him, I fell at His feet as a dead man. And He laid His right hand upon me, saying, ‘Do not be afraid; I am the first and the last.” This title is given following the encouraging imperative of Jesus: “Do not be afraid” (v. 17). Why is John afraid? Because of merely seeing Jesus?

The imperative “do not be afraid” connected to egō eimi of Jesus occurs also in John 6:20 (cf. Matt 14:27; Mark 6:50). In this setting, the disciples were afraid because they “beheld Jesus walking on the sea and drawing near to the boat” (John 6:19). The response of John to what he saw is a little different: he fell at the feet of Jesus (Rev 1:17). In addition to its mention in Rev 1:17, the expression “I fell down (epesa) before the feet” occurs two other times (19:10; 22:8), where aorist infinitive proskynēsai, “to worship,” is used to indicate a position or attitude of worship. In these two places, John does not fall down because he is afraid of the divine/angelic being. He falls down to worship.24 However, it is hard to understand that in 1:17 John falls to worship, because he fell “as a dead man.” Moreover, unlike in 19:10 and 22:8, there is no infinitive proskynēsai in 1:17.

In 1:17, John might have fallen “as a dead man,” because he was afraid of having seen Jesus. In addition, to fall down powerlessly after or when receiving a vision is part of the visionary experience itself, especially when vision of a bright divine being is involved.25 This happens also to Daniel who testified, “So I was left alone and saw this great vision; yet no strength was left in me, for my natural color turned to a deathly pallor, and I retained no strength. But I heard the sound of his words; and as soon as I heard the sound of his words, I fell into a deep sleep on my face, with my face to the ground” (Dan 10:8, 9).26 This situation of Daniel happens also to John described compactly—“as a dead man.” The parallel between Rev 1:9-18 and Dan 10:1-12 demonstrates this.27 Nevertheless, it seems that there is something more frightening to Daniel than simply seeing and hearing the divine being speaking to him. The command “do not be afraid” is followed by the reason not to be afraid: “For from the first day that you set your heart on understanding this and on humbling yourself before your God, your words were heard, and I have come in response to your words” (v. 12). Daniel might have been anxious for not being able to understand what he saw. This had happened before. After receiving the vision of chap 7, Daniel testifies, “my spirit was distressed within me, and the visions in my mind kept alarming me” (v. 15). Then the meaning of the vision is explained to him (vv. 17-27). After seeing the vision of chap 8, Daniel witnesses, “I was astounded at the vision, and there was none to explain it” (v. 27). And the meaning is explained also to him (9:20-27). Now, in 10:1 Daniel once again receives a vision whose details are described in 10:4 – 12:13.28 In the vision he saw the divine being (vv. 5-7). Then a voice says to him, “Do not be afraid . . . Now I have come to give you an understanding . . . for the vision pertains to the days yet future” (vv. 12-14). This seems to indicate that what makes Daniel frightened and distressed is not only the visionary experience itself, but also the contents of the visions and the desire of Daniel to know about the future (v. 14). To such situation, an encouragement comes to him, “Do not be afraid” (v. 12).

The same thing could have happened to John in Rev 1:9-19. John introduces himself as “fellow partaker in the tribulation and kingdom and perseverance which are in Jesus, [and] was on the island called Patmos, because of the word of God and the testimony of Jesus” (v. 9).29 Being in tribulation and exile,30 John might have been searching for explanation about the future. And Revelation was given to show to [through] John “the things which must shortly take place” (1:1; cf. 1:19; 4:1). I would posit, therefore, that the imperative “do not be afraid” of Jesus (1:17) is given to John not only because John was trembling at seeing the bright Jesus, but also to encourage him that Jesus is in control of the future. That is why the egō eimi statement of Jesus follows immediately: “I am the first and the last, and the living One; and I was dead, and behold, I am alive forevermore” (vv. 17, 18).

In the OT, God introduces Himself also as “I am the first and I am the last” (Isa 44:6; cf. 41:4; 48:12).31 Immediately after introducing His title (44:6), God says, “And who is like Me? Let him proclaim and declare it; Yes, let him recount it to Me in order, From the time that I established the ancient nation. And let them declare to them the things that are coming and the events that are going to take place” (44:7; cf. 42:9). Thus, this title is mentioned in the context of God encouraging the Israelites not to be afraid (mē phobou) of their future (41:10, 13; 43:1, 5; 44:2).

The imperative mē phobou, “fear not,” occurs only twice in Revelation, in 1:17 and 2:10—the message to the church at Smyrna.32 Significantly, both imperatives occur in similar context. To the church at Smyrna, Christ introduces himself as well as “The first and the last, who was dead, and has come to life” (2:8; cf. 1:17, 18). In addition, like John, the church at Smyrna also suffers tribulation. The word thlipsis, “tribulation,” occurs twice (2:9, 10). This suggests that the imperative “fear not” is an encouragement for those in tribulation; the title “the first and the last” is the reason why they should not fear the tribulation.

By connecting His title “the first and the last” with His death and resurrection (2:8; cf. 1:17, 18), Christ encourages the church at Smyrna, “Be faithful until death, and I will give you the crown of life” (v. 10). The preposition achri, “until,” indicates “the continuous extent of time up to a point.”33 In the case of the Christians in Smyrna, they are encouraged to remain faithful from the point they receive the message, through a period of time, up to the point of their death.34 The mention of the crown (of life) for the saints is found only twice in the messages to the seven churches (2:10; 3:11). In both places the same word stephanos is used. To the church of Smyrna stephanos is related to the death of the saints, and to the church of Philadelphia it is related to the coming of Jesus. This parallel suggests that the Christians in Smyrna are encouraged to remain faithful until the coming of Jesus (cf. 2:25).35 In this picture, the title of Jesus as “the first and the last” is mentioned in the framework of a period of continuous time from the first century A.D. up to the coming of Jesus.

The idea of a continuous period of time portrayed in the message to Smyrna is also hinted by the mention of a period of ten days, within which, the Christians will suffer tribulation (v. 10).36 The message is not only concerned about their present life, but the suffering that is going to take place shortly as well (ha melleis paschein). Then Jesus encourages them to remain faithful until His coming. This encouragement is followed by a promise that they will not be injured by the second death (v. 11), something that will take place even after the millennium (20:5, 6).37 It seems that the brief message to the church at Smyrna covers a long period of time: from the present time of the Smyrnan Christians, their immediate future, the Second Coming, and the post-millennial events. The title “the first and the last” fits into this historical timeline. Thus, Jesus as “the first and the last” is concerned not only with what happens at the first and at the last, but from the first to the last, at least in the context of the message to Smyrna.

The idea above is supported by the OT concept of the use of the phrase hoi prōtoi kai hoi eschatoi, “the first and the last” (2 Chron 9:29; 12:15; 16:11; 20:34; 25:26; 26:22; 28:26; 35:27), describing the entire history of a king. Take Solomon as an instance: “Now the rest of the acts of Solomon, from first to last, are they not written in the records?” (2Chron 9:29). This statement should not be understood that it is only the first and the last parts of his life that are written in the records. The section of 1Chron 28 to 2Chron 9 contains a long history of Solomon. In addition to this record, many more are written in the records of Nathan, Ahijah, and Iddo. In this case, the phrase hoi prōtoi kai hoi eschatoi should be understood as “from the first to the last,” covering historical timeline from the beginning of Solomon’s reign until his death.38

The context of Rev 1:17, 18, its parallel with the message to the church at Smyrna (2:8-11), and the OT concept of the use of hoi prōtoi kai hoi eschatoi, suggest that the introduction of Jesus’ title “the first and the last” at the beginning of the book of Revelation implies historical bearing. The fact that the first mention of the title is related to the death and resurrection of Jesus, and the last mention of the title to the Second Coming (Rev 22:12, 13), indicates that Revelation covers a period of time from the death and resurrection of Jesus until His second coming, even until post-millennial time.

The Beginning and the End ( archē kai to telos)

Although Christ’s title “the beginning and the end” appears only at the end of Revelation (21:6; 22:13), its concept has been at the beginning of the book. In His message to the church at Laodicea, Christ introduces Himself as hē archē tēs ktiseōs tou theou, “the beginning of the creation of God” (3:14).

The connection of hē archē with creation is not a new concept. Genesis 1:1 puts it clear that “in the beginning God created the heavens and earth.” This concept is repeated by John in his gospel: “In the beginning was the Word . . . All things came into being by Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being” (John 1:1, 3).39 What follows en archē is a reference to creation (1:3). Next is the incarnation of Jesus (1:14), His baptism (vv. 29-34), and His earthly ministry (1:35 – 21:23). If the gospel of John begins with “in the beginning” one may expect to see what point designates the end of the gospel. The earthly ministry of Jesus brought him to the cross where He completed His mission of salvation, saying “it is finished” (19:30).40 What follows the death of Jesus is His burial (19:38-42), His resurrection (20:1-10), and His appearances to His disciples (20:11 – 21:23). It seems that John arranges his Gospel within a time sequence framework, starting from en archē /, “in the beginning” (1:1), and ending up with tetelestai, “it is finished” (19:30).

The fact that the book of Revelation begins with a reference to the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ (1:5, 18) throws an idea that Revelation is a continuation of the gospel of John. Moreover, there seems to be a parallel between John 21:24 and Rev 1:2. John ends his gospel saying, “This is the disciple who bears witness of these things, and wrote these things; and we know that his witness (martyria) is true” (John 21:24), and begins the Apocalypse saying, “who bore witness to the word of God and to the testimony (martyrian) of Jesus Christ, even to all that he saw” (Rev 1:2). The linking key word martyria occurs significantly in Johannine writings. Of 32 occurrences in the NT, 13 times it occurs in the gospel of John, 7 times in his epistles, and 9 times in Revelation.41

The apocalyptic narrative of Revelation ends with the divine statement gegonan, “they have taken place” (21:6). This statement is made in the setting of the new heavens and the new earth, after a series of eschatological events: the Second Coming, the first resurrection (20:6), the millennium (vv. 5-7), the second death (v. 6), destruction of the wicked and Satan in the lake of fire (v. 9, 10), and down-coming of the New Jerusalem (21:1, 2). Combining his Gospel and the Apocalypse, it seems that John has presented a complete narrative of salvation from “in the beginning” up to the new heaven and the new earth. The title “the beginning and the end” is introduced just at the announcement “it is done” (21:6), after God says, “Behold, I am making all things new” (v. 5). Therefore, the title “the beginning and the end,” connotes a historical understanding of the demonstration of God’s power, from the creation up to the re-creation.42 Within this time framework, the apocalyptic events of Revelation are described historically, from the time of the seven churches up to the creation of the new heavens and the new earth.

Exchatological Significance of Alpha and the Omega

The explanation about the titles “the first and the last” and “the beginning and the end” above is enlightening to the implication of the title “the Alpha and the Omega.” It has been discussed above, that the title “the first and the last” signals a historical emphasis on the reading of the book of Revelation. It suggests that the book of Revelation covers a continuous period of time since the time of John up to the Second Coming, even the post-millennial events. The title “the beginning and the end” signifies the power of Jesus Christ as the creator of the heaven and earth and the re-creator of the new heavens and the new earth. The John-Revelation context of the title calls for a historical reading of Jesus’ ministry from creation to re-creation.

In the context of the two titles above, “The title ‘the Alpha and the Omega,’ like the one ‘who is, and who was, and who is to come,’ indicates God’s eternality, that all of history from beginning to end is the same to him.”43 Questions arise: Does the title only indicate God’s eternality and His control over all of history? Or, does it also suggest a reading of Revelation in the framework of the meaning of the title—from the beginning to the end? Could this way of reading be attested in the book of Revelation?

In order to attest the Alpha-Omega reading of Revelation, I discuss below the journey of the church from the time of John up to the eschaton. The recipient of Revelation is stated obviously and directly in the prologue: “John to the seven churches that are in Asia” (Rev 1:4). The reoccurrence of “the churches” in the epilogue (22:16) indicates that the book of Revelation discusses in details Christ’s church from the beginning to the end of the book.44 In Revelation, the condition of Christ’s church is first elaborated in Rev 2-3.45 Then the church goes through a series of events within period of times since the first century until the Second Coming. This could be seen in the literary structure of the seven seals (Rev 4–7). In 3:21 Jesus promises, “He who overcomes, I will grant to him to sit down with Me on My throne, as I also overcame and sat down with My Father on His throne.”46 Revelation 4 and 5 portray the enthronement of Jesus after His ascension.47 In Rev 7, the 144,000 or the great multitude stand before the throne of God. This is the group that is able to stand before God while the wicked perish at the Second Coming (6:15-17).48 This brings to a conclusion that the seals depicted in Rev 6 portray the struggle of the church since the first century up to the coming of Jesus.

Rev 7:15-17 describe further the great multitude: “They are before the throne of God; and they serve Him day and night in His temple; and He who sits on the throne shall spread His tabernacle over them. They shall hunger no more, neither thirst anymore; neither shall the sun beat down on them, nor any heat; for the Lamb in the center of the throne shall be their shepherd, and shall guide them to springs of the water of life; and God shall wipe every tear from their eyes.” These descriptions parallel the descriptions of the saints in Rev 21:3-4 whose timeframe is after the millennium (chap 20). It means the church passes through a period of time from the first century up to the renewal of the heaven and the earth, including the 42 months (Rev 11:2; cf. 13:5) or 1260 days (12:6), and the millennium (chap 20). In this case, the title “the Alpha and the Omega” is not merely “his [God’s] timeless sovereignty for the encouragement of Asian Christians who are facing persecution for their faith.”49 It also projects the involvement of the church in the conflict between Satan against God along the timeline of history. In addition, it reveals the final victory of the church together with Jesus (Rev 14:1).

The picture of the continuous journey of Christ’s church along the timeline of history above is only one of some other entities in Revelation whose existence could be traced or identified historically. Let me take one more: Satan. His work is obviously shown in Rev 2 and 3 (2:9, 13, 24; 3:9).50 During the period of 1260 days within which the church of God is protected (12:6), Satan works through the sea-beast to persecute God’s people (13:5-7). During the millennium, when the saints reign together with Christ in heaven (20:6), Satan is bound for the same period of time (v. 2). He is released after the one thousand years to face his final fate, namely, be thrown into the lake of fire. Significantly, the first and the last mentions of diabolos, “devil” in Revelation are related with the verb ballō, “to throw, cast.” At the first mention, the devil is about to throw some of God’s people into prison where they would suffer tribulation for ten days (2:10). At the last mention, the devil himself is thrown into the lake of fire forever and ever (20:10). The one throwing him into the lake of fire remains forever and ever. He is the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End, the Living one.

Therefore, the title of Jesus as Alpha and the Omega in Revelation assures the fulfilment of the eschatological events described in Revelation. The assurance is built up on the fact that Jesus Christ is in control of the historical events since the beginning, along the historical timeline, and until the end.

Conclusion and Recommendation

The egō eimi titles of “the Alpha and the Omega,” “the First and the Last,” and “the Beginning and the End” interchangeably refer to Jesus Christ. The last two actually explain the meaning of the first one. As it is in the gospel of John, the egō eimi introductions of Jesus in Revelation enlighten the interpretation or the reading of the passages where the titles are found. The three titles of Jesus are found at the beginning and at the end of Revelation. This suggests that they shed light to the reading of the whole book of Revelation, from the section of the seven churches whose the timeframe is the first century AD (chaps 2-3), up to the section of the new heaven and the new earth whose time setting is after the millennium (chaps 21-22).

The message of these three titles is an encouragement for Christ’s church not to be afraid of their future. The book of Revelation presents the journey of the church from the first century AD up to the second coming, even until the post-millennial time. The devil—the enemy, although have put forth all his effort to destroy the church, will be destroyed at the end. Christ and His church are triumphant. As far as the history of the human being is concerned, the title “the Alpha and the Omega” describes Christ’s sovereignty over history from the creation up to the re-creation. What revealed in Revelation is part of it. With this macro overview, the book of Revelation could be understood from a historical perspective, from the first century AD up to the eschaton. For the original audience, it was a long future before them; for the present audience, it has been a long history, with some eschatological events remain for the future. For the Alpha and the Omega declares: “Behold, the former things have come to pass, now I declare new things; before they spring forth I proclaim them to you” (Isa 42:9).


  1. The statement “I am the Alpha and the Omega” in 1:8 is spoken by “the Lord God, who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty.” In 1:4, the phrase “who is, and who was, and who is to come,” is attached to God in distinction from Jesus Christ (v. 5). In 4:8, the phrase “the Lord God Almighty, who was, and is, and is to come” occurs again as referring also to God, before Jesus Christ be introduced in chap 5.

    Back to reference
  2. The statement “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End” (22:13) is continuation of the statement of Jesus in 22:12, “Behold, I am coming soon! My reward is with me, and I will give to everyone according to what he has done.” Therefore the Alpha and the Omega in 22:13 refers to Jesus Christ.

    Back to reference
  3. Except specifically indicated, all English Bible texts are taken from the New American Standard Version (NAS).

    Back to reference
  4. Grant R. Osborne, Revelation, Baker Exegetical Commentary of the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2002), 71, argues that in 1:8 and 21:6 the title refers to God and in 22:13 it refers to Jesus. However, the fact that the title “the Alpha and the Omega” the use of the phrases “the first and the last” (1:17) and “the beginning and the end” (21:6) are altogether used by Jesus as referring to Jesus suggests that To mention some, see for example, Steve Gregg, Revelation Four Views: A Parallel Commentary (Nashville, TN: Tomas Nelson, 1997), 491.

    Back to reference
  5. Steve Greek, ed., Revelation Four Views: A Parallel Commentary (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1997), 58. See also Robert H. Mounce, The Book of Revelation, rev. ed, New International Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998), 407

    Back to reference
  6. Craig S. Keener, Revelation: The New International Version Application Commentary (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2000), 515. So also Edmondo F. Lupieri, A Commentary on the Apocalypse of John, trans. Maria Poggi Johnson and Adam Kamesar (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1999), 333.

    Back to reference
  7. There is no point of doubting the descriptions referring to Jesus Christ. Scholars agree on this matter. See for example Keener, 94-98; Mounce, 57-61; Gregg, 59-61; Lupieri, 109-112. See also, Roy Allan Anderson, Unfolding the Revelation: Evangelistic Studies for Public Presentation, revised version (Mountain View, CA: Pacific Press, 1974), 8, 9.

    Back to reference
  8. (1) One like a son of man (in the middle of the seven lampstands); (2) clothed in a robe reaching to the feet; (3) Girded across His breast with a golden girdle; (4) His head and His hair were white like white wool, like snow; (5) His eyes were like a flame of fire; (6) His feet were like burnished bronze, when it has been caused to glow in a furnace; (7) His voice was like the sound of many waters; (8) In His right hand He held seven stars; (9) Out of His mouth came a sharp two-edged sword; (10) His face was like the sun shining in its strength; (11) The first and the last; and (12) The living One. The phrase “I was dead, and behold, I am alive forevermore, and I have the keys of death and of Hades” (1:18) simply explains the title “the living One.”

    Back to reference
  9. These eight are mentioned in relation to the first five churches. To Ephesus (Rev 2:1): (1) The One who holds the seven stars in His right hand, (2) One who walks among the seven golden lampstands. To Smyrna (v. 8): (3) The first and the last; (4) Who was dead, and has come to life. To Pergamum (v. 12): (5) The One who has the sharp two-edged sword. To Thyatira (v. 18): (6) The Son of God (similar to “One like a son of man” in 1:13); (7) Who has eyes like a flame of fire; (8) His feet are like burnished bronze. To Sardis, the description “He who has the seven Spirits of God, and the seven stars” (3:1) resounds the first description to Ephesus.

    Back to reference
  10. See Mounce 66 – 115 for extensive discussion on the relations between the descriptions of Jesus in Rev 1:13 – 18 and the use of those descriptions at the introductions to each of the seven churches. See also Clinton Wahlen, “Heaven’s View of the Church in Revelation 2 and 3,” Journal of Asia Adventist Seminary 9.2 (2006): 151-55.

    Back to reference
  11. The descriptions of Jesus as ho hagios, “who is holy” in the message to the church of Philadelphia (3:7) is similar to the title of Jesus in John 6:69, ho hagios tou Theou. Also the title ho alēthinos, “who is true,” is similar to the title of Jesus in 1 John 5:20, namely, ho alēthinos theos, “the true God.” Jesus title ho martys ho pistos, “the faithful witness,” presented to the Laodiceans (Rev 3:14) has been introduced in 1:5.

    Back to reference
  12. See Keener, 149-58.

    Back to reference
  13. It occurs six times in the synoptic gospels (Matt 14:27; 22:32; Mark 6:50; 14:62; Luke 22:70; 24:39). The appearance of egō eimi separated by other words in a sentence is not counted. Only direct statements of Jesus are counted.

    Back to reference
  14. It occurs 27 times (John 4:26; 6:20; 6:35; 6:41; 6:48; 6:51; 7:34; 7:36; 8:12; 8:18; 8:24; 8:28; 8:58; 10:7; 10:9; 10:11; 10:14; 11:25; 12:26; 13:19; 14:3; 14:6; 15:1; 15:5; 18:5; 18:6; 18:8) including all Jesus’ direct statements where egō eimi is used. A. M. Okorie, “The Self-Revelation of Jesus in the ‘I Am’ Sayings of John’s Gospel,” Currents in Theology and Mission 28:5 (October 2001): 487-90, highlights the theological implication of “I Am” saying of Jesus in John’s Gospel.

    Back to reference
  15. I consider John 13:1 to 17:26 as a unit passage whose event take place in the Upper Room context. John 13:1 indicates the beginning of the passage and 18:1 clues that it was after Jesus prayed, He and His disciples left the room to the place where He was arrested. Arlo D. Duba, “Hints for a Morphology of Eucharistie Praying: A Study of John 13:31-17:26,” Worship, 57 no 4 (Jl 1983): 366, also argues that John 14 – 17 is part of the Upper Room event that begins in chap 13. He mentions and supports Raymond E. Brown, The Gospel According to John, vol. 2 (The Anchor Bible, Garden City, New York: Doubleday 1970) 656; Lesslie Newbigin, The Light Has Come: An Exposition of the Fourth Gospel (Grand Rapids, Michigan Erdmans 1982.

    Back to reference
  16. The same principle applies to the self-introduction of Jesus as “I am the resurrection and life” (11:25). This introduction is used in the context of the death and resurrection of Lazarus (11:1-43). Space does not allow including all occurrences of the “I am” saying of Jesus in this paper. In some cases, Jesus declares Himself with a title or description to introduce a particular teaching He wants to convey. For example “I am the door” (10:7), “I am the good shepherd” (10:11), etc. See also Stephen S. Smalley, John: Evangelist & Interpreter, New Testament Profile, 2nd edition (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1998), 135. He provides a table of the connection between the seven signs, the seven discourses, and the seven I-am sayings of Jesus. He says that this connection between the signs, the discourses, and the sayings of Jesus gives evidence of “the unity of thought and structure in John” (ibid., 134).

    Back to reference
  17. Leonhard Goppelt, Theology of the New Testament, II (Grand Rapids, 1982), 294-5, cited by Leon Morris, Jesus Is The Christ: Studies in the Theology of John (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1989), 109. Morris discusses in details the significance of the I-am saying in each context where it is found in the gospel of John (Ibid., 109-25).

    Back to reference
  18. Two of these seven occurrences are not in egō eimi construction but simply in egō followed by nominative nouns: egō to Alpha kai to Omega, ho prōtos kai ho eschatos, hē archē kai to telos (Rev 22:13); and egō Iēsous (v. 16).

    Back to reference
  19. There are other titles of Jesus in Revelation but are not introduced in the format of evgw. eivmi construction, for example: “the faithful witness, the first-born of the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth” (Rev 1:5).

    Back to reference
  20. The three components of ho ōn kai ho hēn kai ho erchomenos occur in these three places. In 11:17 and 16:5 the description also appear but only with two components, namely, ho hēn kai ho ōn, “who was and who is.” In 1:17 there is a textual variant in the Greek New Testament in which some manuscripts suggest the use of all three components instead of only two. However, there is no textual variant in 16:5. This suggests that the shorter reading is preferable. Bruce M. Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament: A Companion Volume to the United Bible Societies’ Greek New Testament (third edition) (London/New York: United Bible Societies, 1975), 745 explains that the longer reading is “a typical Byzantine accretion, in imitation of the tripartite expression in 1.4, 8; cf. 4.8.”

    Back to reference
  21. Although the name Jesus appears significantly in Revelation (14 times), it is the proper name described by all other titles. Only the occurrence of this name introduced by egō is counted. Moreover, the occurrence of the name in the nominative case is only once—in 22:16 where the name is introduced by egō. This study focuses more on the descriptions/titles of Jesus rather than the name Jesus itself.

    Back to reference
  22. Interestingly, the three titles of Jesus in 22:13 follow the sequence of their first introductions in Revelation: to Alpha kai to Omega (1:8), ho prōtos kai ho eschatos (1:17) and hē archē kai to telos (21:6).

    Back to reference
  23. The title “who is, who was, and who is to come” is not discussed in detail. In its three occurrences, it never refers directly to Jesus. The title ho pantokratōr, although occurs seven times of which one does together with the Alpha and the Omega (1:8), is not discussed in this paper. It may require a separate paper to focus upon this particular title of God.

    Back to reference
  24. In addition to its appearance in aorist first person singular epesa, the verb piptō also occurs in aorist third person plural epesan, “they fall,” that indicate a position or attitude of worship (5:8; 5:14; 7:11; 11:16; 19:4).

    Back to reference
  25. G.R. Beasley-Murray , ed. New Century Bible: The book of Revelation (Greenwood, SC: The Attic, 1978), 67, comments, “John’s reaction to the vision of the glorified Christ is typical of all who have known any comparable experience (see Dan. 10:7ff, which is especially in mind, but also Jos. 5:14, Isa 6:4, Ezek 1:28). Equally characteristic are the reassuring words of the Lord to the prophet, but in this case the declaration of Christ actually forms the climax of the vision.”

    Back to reference
  26. Tim Meadowcroft, “Who are the Princes of Persia and Greece (Daniel 10)? Pointers Towards the Daniel Vision of Earth and Heaven,” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 29.1 (2004): 106, says that those physical responses are “experience of being caught up into a vision.”

    Back to reference
  27. There is parallel between Rev 1:9-18 and Dan 10:1-12 as shown in the table below:

    Elements

    Dan 10:1-12

    Rev 1:9-18

    Time of the vision

    In the third year of Cyrus king of Persia a message was revealed to Daniel (v. 1)

    I, John, . . . I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day (vv. 9-10)

    Vision of Divine Person

    a certain man dressed in linen, whose waist was girded with a belt of pure gold of Uphaz … his face had the appearance of lightning, his eyes were like flaming torches, his arms and feet like the gleam of polished bronze, and the sound of his words like the sound of a

    tumult (vv. 5,6 )

    one like a son of man, … girded across His breast with a golden girdle. … and His eyes were like a flame of fire; and His feet were like burnished bronze, … and His voice was like the sound of many waters. (vv. 13-16)

    Visionary responses

    So I was left alone and saw this great vision; yet no strength was left in me, for my natural color turned to a deathly

    pallor, and I retained no strength . . . I fell into a deep sleep on my face, with my face to the ground (vv. 8, 9)

    And when I saw Him, I fell at His feet as a dead man (v. 17a)

    Words of Encouragement

    a hand touched me . . . Then he said to me, “Do not be afraid, Daniel.” (vv. 10-12)

    And He laid His right hand upon me, saying, “Do not be afraid” (v. 17b)

    Reason not to be afraid

    for from the first day that you set your heart on understanding this . . . Now I have come to give you an understanding of what will happen to your people in the latter days, for the vision pertains to the days yet future (vv. 12-14)

    I am the first and the last, and the living One; and I was dead, and behold, I am alive forevermore, . . . Write therefore the things which you have seen, and the things which are, and the things which shall take place after these things (vv. 17-19).

    Back to reference
  28. Daniel L. Smith-Christopher, The Book of Daniel: Introduction, Commentary, and Reflections, in The New Interpreter’s Bible: A Commentary in Twelve Volumes, edited by Leader E. Keck et al., vol. VII (Nashville: Abingdon, 1996), 136, explains the introduction in 10:1 with the mention of a “word” given to Daniel is unusual. “This is the first occasion for a spoken message in place of a vision; yet as the chapter continues, it is clear that this message is not just an audio message. . . we can only assume that that ‘word’ is to be taken as inclusive of the entire experience that follows. What is emphasized, however, is the auditory nature of the visionary experience.” An outline is presented in Dan 10:1: (A) The time of the vision; (B) The recipient of the vision; (C) The content of the vision; (D) Indication that finally the vision is understood by the prophet. It could be said that v. 1 is the summary, and v. 2 begins the story. See also James A. Montgomery, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Book of Daniel, The International Critical Commentary (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1927), 405, that suggests, “The ‘word’ is the divine utterance, the ‘vision’ the revelation; the word is impotent until divine grace unfolds the mystery. And so a progress is prob. implied in the last two sentences.”

    Back to reference
  29. Leonard Thompson, “A Sociological Analysis of Tribulation in the Apocalypse of John,” Semeia no. 36 (1986), 149-50, states that Rev 1:9 is “the most significant passage in the Apocalypse regarding tribulation.” Although refutes the idea that Patmos is an island of exile, he really emphasize the theme of tribulation in the book of Revelation (pp. 150-153).

    Back to reference
  30. John J. Gunther, “The Elder John, Author of Revelation,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament no. 11 (April 1981), 3, refers to the testimony of Eusebius that John was banished in the isle of Patmos by Domitian but later restored by Nerva and took his residence in Ephesus.

    Back to reference
  31. LXX: egō prōtos kai egō meta tauta, “I am first and I am after these things.”

    Back to reference
  32. Although the one in 2:10 is mhde.n fobou/, “fear nothing,” the imperative is just the same.

    Back to reference
  33. Johannes P. Louw and Eugene A. Nida, Greek–Lexicon of the New Testament Based on Semantic Domains, 2 vol. (New York: United Bible Societies, 1988), s.v. “a;cri.”

    Back to reference
  34. Several uses of the preposition archi in Revelation, such as Rev 2:26; 12:11; 20:3, 5.

    Back to reference
  35. Connecting the message to the church at Smyrna and the message to Philadephia is supported by the parallels between the two churches below:

    Smyrna (2:8-11)

    Philadelphia (3:7-13)

    Metanoeō is absent (it occurs in the messages to all other churches)

    Metanoeō is absent

    “those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan” (2:9)

    “those of the synagogue of Satan, who say that they are Jews, and are not” (3:9)

    “Do not fear what you are about to suffer. Behold, the devil is about to cast some of you into prison, that you may be tested (peirasthēte)” (2:10)

    “I also will keep you from the hour of testing (tou peirasmou)” (3:10)

    “Be faithful until death, and I will give you the crown of life (ton stephanon tēs zōēs)” (2:10)

    “hold fast what you have, in order that no one take your crown (ton stephanon sou)” (3:11)

    Back to reference
  36. Alberto R. Timm, “Miniature Symbolization and the Year-Day Principle of Prophetic Interpretation,” Andrews University Seminary Studies 42 (2004): 149, considers the “year-day principle” as “a basic hermeneutical component of the historicist school of prophetic interpretation.” He considers “ten days” (Rev 2:10) as part of the miniature symbolization of the church in Smyrna. For that reason, he argues that the church in Smyrna is a miniature symbol of the Christian church between A.D. 100 and A.D. 313. Therefore, according to him, Rev 2 and 3 should be interpreted in the historicist perspective.

    Back to reference
  37. I am aware of various suggestions about the time of millennium. Whatever one’s view on millennium is, the Bible is obvious (Rev 20:5, 6) that the second death takes place after the millennium and the first death takes place before the millennium or at the beginning of the millennium, which is the Second Coming (see explanation in p. 7 above about a;cri and ste,fanoj).

    Back to reference
  38. Some English versions represent this understanding correctly. The NAS, and RSV, for example, translate hoi prōtoi kai hoi eschatoi as “from first to last.”

    Back to reference
  39. I assume that the Gospel of John and the book of Revelation are authored by the same John.

    Back to reference
  40. The expression tetelestai, “It has been finished,” occurs uniquely in the Gospel of John. The synoptics put it differently: “And Jesus cried out again with a loud voice, and yielded up His spirit” (Matt 27:50); “And Jesus cried out with a loud voice, and breathed His last” (Mark 15:37); “And when Jesus had cried out with a loud voice, He said, ‘Father, into Your hands I commit My spirit.’ Having said this, He breathed His last” (Luke 23:46).

    Back to reference
  41. This continuation of John-Revelation is similar to that of Luke-Acts. I discussed scholars’ opinions about this idea. Please see Richard A. Sabuin, “The Growing of Christ: A Study on Luke 2:52 in the Light of the Structural Pattern of Luke-Acts.” JAAS 10.1 (2007):---

    Back to reference
  42. The verb poieō, “I make, do” used in the phrase “I am making all things new” (Rev 21:5), is the same verb used in the LXX of Gen 1:1, 7, 16, 21, 25, 27, 31.

    Back to reference
  43. Kenner, 73. Mounce, 51 highlights the significance of Alpha and Omega as representing “the Hebrew Aleph and Tau, which were regarded not simply as the first and last letters of the alphabet, but as including all the letters in between. Hence, the title sets forth God as the sovereign Lord over everything that takes place in the entire course of human history.”

    Back to reference
  44. Ekkehardt Müller, “Introduction to the Ecclesiology of the Book of Revelation,” Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 12.2 (Aut 2001): 199-200 lists down the various designations of the church in Revelation: “(1) fellow servants, brothers, servants (1:1; 2:20; 6:11; 7:3; 12:10; 19:2, 5; 22:3, 6), (2) the church (ekklēsia; 1:4, 11, 20; 2:1, 7, 8, 11, 12, 17, 18, 23, 29; 3:1, 6, 7, 13, 14, 22; 22:16), (3) priests and a kingdom (1:6; 5:10; 20:6), (4) lampstands (1:20), (5) the overcomer (2-3; 15:2; 21:7), (6) the remnant (2:24; 12:7), (7) those in white clothes (3:4–5; 6:11; 7:9, 13), (8) the saints (5:8; 8:3-4; 11:18; 13:7; 14:12; 16:6; 17:7; 18:20, 24; 19:8; 29:9), (9) the 144,000 (7:4-8; 14:1-5), (10) the great multitude (7:9;17), (11) the holy city (11:12), (12) the woman (12; 19:7; 21:9), (13) those that are called, chosen, faithful (17:14), (14) my people and his people (18:4; 21:3), (15) the bride (21:9; 22:17), and (16) the twelve tribes of Israel and the 12 apostles of the Lamb (21:12, 14).

    Back to reference
  45. The seven churches were not the only churches existing in Asia at that time. Steve Moyise, The Old Testament in the Book of Revelation, Journal for the Study of the New Testament (JSNT) Supplement Series, no. 115, ed. Stanley E. Porter (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1995), 26 explains that the selection of the seven churches is in a geographical sequence/order. In addition, it is not John who selected the churches but Jesus Christ. This indicates that “the local congregations form one universal church” (Müller, 200). Lowell J. Satre, “Interpreting the Book of Revelation, “ Word & World 4.1 (Wint 1984), 63, posits, “It may be that only seven are named because the number seven in Revelation symbolizes completeness; John therefore means to address the whole church with his book.”

    Back to reference
  46. The use of the future tense dōsō, “I will give” in the promise to the church indicates that it would be still in their future. For Jesus, the aorist tense enikēsa, “I overcame,” indicates that the His sitting on the throne has begun in the past, from the perspective of the date of the writing of Revelation, either in the 60s or in the 90s AD.

    Back to reference
  47. Ranko Stefanovic, Revelation of Jesus Christ: Commentary on the Book of Revelation (Berrien Springs, MI: Andrews University Press, 2002), 220-25.

    Back to reference
  48. Müller, 202.

    Back to reference
  49. Rev 12 outlines Satan’s effort against Christ. It was actually originated in heaven (v. 7-9). See Jon Paulien, “The End of Historicism?: Reflections on the Adventist Approach to Biblical Apocalyptic—Part Two,” JATS 17/1 (Spring 2006): 180-208 for the historical timeline of the conflict between Satan against Christ (and His people).

    Back to reference